Monday, January 23, 2012

Are Conservatives Using Newt?


Today I heard Rush Limbaugh put out a very interesting theory about why Newt Gingrich is becoming so popular among conservatives.  I decided to share it with you in case you didn't hear Rush's show today and hopefully get some feedback.

I linked to the transcript (below) and will give you a summary.

Newt is a Vessel: He Won South Carolina Because He Articulated Conservatism

Rush's theory is that, it's not that conservatives are choosing Gingrich as their guy, it's that they are sending a message to the "GOP establishment" that they will not let the Republican establishment tell them who their candidate will be.  Conservatives will not have Romney shoved down their throats, so they are voting for a guy who knows how to articulate conservatism.  Hopefully, they (the GOP establishment) will get the message.

What's going on here is the conservative base trying to send a message to the Republican establishment: "You're gonna have to have somebody who's legitimately conservative. That's the only way we're gonna be passionately behind our nominee, and that's the only way we're gonna beat Obama." This is something really big. This is not the voters saying, "We love Newt! Newt's the only guy!" That's not what's going on here. Newt's a vessel right now, and Newt would be wise to understand that, too.
I think Rush makes a good point.  Conservatives are tired of candidates who can not speak clearly about conservatism and sell it to the country.

But Rush warns Newt that if he strays from conservatism, as he has in the past, the whole thing is going to blow up in his face.  Ripping the media will only go so far and will get old, fast.  Newt not only has to "talk the talk", he has to "walk the walk".

I'm just telling you, Juan Williams, John King could have asked the same questions to any other Republican and it woulda sunk 'em, because none of them are willing to articulate conservative. Maybe not Santorum.  Santorum probably coulda hung in there.  Now, this presents a huge stumbling block potential for Newt.  He is vulnerable on the very thing he can do better than anybody else.  He had better fully embrace his conservatism and not make it a part-time thing.  The days of being able to keep this momentum going by ripping on the media are over.  The standing ovations for taking on the media are over, or they have a very short life span.  He can't live on that anymore.  Been there, done that.  It's gonna get old and it's gonna look like it's been set up.  There's not gonna be any drama to it, therefore there's not gonna be all that spontaneous "way to go" standing O stuff, unless it's just outrageous.  You only go to the well so many times on this stuff. 

Newt keeps pushing off any questions on his anti-conservative statements.  And he better not.  I think Newt is just as vulnerable on his anti-conservatism as Romney is on Romneycare.  "What do you mean by that, Rush?"  Very simple.  Newt has made it plain two or three times that he's very open to the concept of manmade global warming.  He can blow this by sitting on the couch with Pelosi again or something that is equivalent.  Newt has in the past had some unflattering things to say about capitalism.  His time at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac is a vulnerability. Saying that FDR is the best president, his favorite president, that doesn't jibe with being a conservative.  His open support for single payer health insurance with a mandate.  I'm just telling you, Newt's not out of the woods here.  And Newt and his crew had better understand that he's where he is not just because of a media smackdown, not just because of debates.  He's articulating conservatism when he does this stuff, and if he stops doing that or if he waters it down or if he gets caught in an example where people can be convinced he doesn't really believe this stuff...
As far as I'm concerned, Rick Santorum is the most conservative GOP candidate we have to choose from at this time.  On January 31st, I will be sending my message to the GOP establishment by voting for Rick Santorum in the Florida Primary.  The question is...will they eventually get the message?

What do you think about Rush's theory?

Sunday, January 22, 2012

Obama Promises, "Jobs for Everybody"

Click on Cartoon for Larger View

h/t Bill K

Sunday, January 15, 2012

You Don't Have To Be A Dog Owner to Enjoy This One

Wednesday, January 4, 2012

UPDATE 1/6: Are You Willing To Share The Blame?


I have refrained from publicly supporting any one GOP candidate for president and I am still not going to take the plunge yet.  There are those who are not my favorites and others who I like.

Michele Bachmann was one I believe has conservative values I could support, but today she has decided to drop out.  Good call for her because of the poor results she had in Iowa and a lack of funding that made it prohibitive for her to continue in the race.  I like Rick Santorum, too.  I believe he has a love of America and strong core values.  His economic policies sound good and he is knowledgeable and strong on foreign policy.  I was happy to see him do so well in the Iowa caucuses.

We all know that conservatives are looking for an "anti-Romney" candidate.  Now that Bachmann is out, Perry is praying on it (although an earlier Tweet today gives us reason to believe he's still in the race), Gingrich has been beaten to a pulp by negative ads and has loads of baggage, Huntsman is too moderate to be considered an anti-Romney, and Paul may have a good handle on the economy but his foreign policy is weak (and scary), we are focusing on Rick Santorum.  I'm not saying any of the other candidates can't rise to the top, but for right now Santorum is the next in line for scrutiny.

Today begins the onslaught of negative articles and ads against Rick Santorum.  Did you read that he's a "big government conservative"?  Or that he's an anti-abortion statist?  Or that he's a right-wing nut?  Or that he's a big earmark supporter?  Or that he supported Arlen Specter?  Well get ready, because the Left and the establishment-Right are revving up to discredit him.  They both want Romney to be the GOP nominee.  Did you hear that John McCain just endorsed Romney?  (That's enough to turn me off...and may be the kiss of death for Romney.)

It's obvious that there is NO PERFECT GOP presidential candidate. 

Don't think everything will be OK as long as the GOP wins control of both houses of Congress in 2012.  It is essential that the GOP win back the Senate and keep the House, but even that will not be enough if Barack Obama is re-elected.  Beside his veto power, we already know he thinks bypassing Congress is the easiest way to ensure his agenda is enforced.  He just did it again today.  And if the Supreme Court does not rule against ObamaCare, there will be no chance to repeal it EVER if Obama wins.  It will be well on it's way to full enactment.

I believe we must vet the GOP presidential candidates based on TRUTH and vote for our best choice in the primaries.  Hopefully, we will choose the most conservative candidate who can WIN and that our choice will be a stark contrast to Obama.  But at some point there will be one man standing, and if we don't put our full support behind that one person, Barack Obama will be elected again and America's "fundamental change" (to socialism/Marxism) will be complete with no turning back.  The Progressives will have ensured their control of America into the future by making the vast majority of Americans dependent on big government more than ever before in history.

In the November general election, each of us must decide if we will be able to pull the GOP lever for someone who may not be our first choice.  If you can't vote for the GOP candidate on principle and you decide to "make a statement" by either writing in a name, voting third party or sitting at home and refusing to vote, then you must be ready to share in the blame if Barack Obama wins.  The real "statement" you will have made is that you are complicit in the downfall of our Republic.  Obama's re-election will seal the fate of America and ensure it's continued slide down into the abyss.  If that happens, don't come here and complain...you'll be talking to the hand.

Watch Rick Santorum's entire Iowa speech at RightScoop.

UPDATE  1/6/12:

One more thought on this...

Over the years Americans have been pretty much apathetic. We let our country get to this point because things were happening under the radar. Our attention span was lacking.
Over the past several years, Americans are waking up to the fact that we are in BIG trouble. With the grace of God, we can only hope that this re-awakening will reflect in our choice of a president in 2012. The best 'not-Obama' choice.
If we elect a Republican for president, even if it's Romney, the people are paying much more attention to what the government is doing. If we do our job, elect good people for the Senate & House, and we continue to stay informed about what our politicians are doing, we have the responsibility to hold them to their promises, keep their feet to the fire, or kick them out in the next election. We can't sit back and think everything is OK if the Republicans get elected. But we do have a better chance of keeping a Republican president and Congress on the right track if we STAY ENGAGED and make our voices HEARD. That's our job from now on.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Happy New Laws 2012



Along with a presidential campaign that is THE most important in recent history, 2012 will bring along some new laws across America that may affect you.

For example...ring out "happy hour specials" in Utah and ring in a new "rainbow" curriculum in California.  If you live in Illinois and ride a motorcycle, there's a new perk for you  (Obama won't have to worry about that.).

Check out the article below and The National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL) website for a list of some of the almost 40,000 new laws going into effect across America sometime in 2012.

Via:  FoxNews.com:

No More Happy Hour in Utah?  New State Laws Set to Ring in 2012

From laws banning happy hour in Utah and shark fin sales in Oregon to tougher voter identification requirements in at least four states, a wide range of new legislation is set to ring in the new year.
According to The National Conference of State Legislatures, which earlier this week issued its annual list of new laws, the legislation will cover education, drug and alcohol policy, criminal justice and human trafficking, among other areas. 
In some cases, the laws could add to the cost of doing business. Other new rules will regulate what Americans eat and drink.  Read more...

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Travis AFB Says "NO" to Secular Group MRFF

Photo:  Travis AFB

Kudos to the Travis Air Force Base in California.  They stood up and said "NO" to the same group who stopped the Air Force Academy from promoting Operation Christmas Child back in November.

Via:  The New American.com

Calif. Air Force Base Stands up to Secularists over Nativity Display

Officials at Travis Air Force Base in California decided days before Christmas that the nativity scene and menorah gracing the grounds of the military facility would stay, in spite of demands from a secular group that they must be removed. A secular grievance group called the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) had threatened to file a lawsuit against the Air Force base unless the Judeo-Christian display, located in a high-traffic area of the base, was relocated to the base’s chapel grounds. A spokesman for the base said that the display has been a tradition for the past 17 years, with no complaints until this year’s assault by the MRFF.
Read more...